Exploring the Importance and Benefits of Displaying Art in Hotels    

The question should be "Why does the hotel and hospitality industry value art to customers?" or better yet "What value do customers derive from this artistic expression?" The relevance of bringing art into a business-centric environment The service shows how well the two worlds come together. This trend has led many other industries, such as interior design and fashion, to draw inspiration from the experience the hospitality industry already has.

Today, we’re seeing more and more companies investing in the idea of ??incorporating artwork into spaces large and small to generate goodwill among employees and a delightful experience for guests.

With the heightened security concerns affecting all aspects of society, including museums, hanging art on the walls of public spaces is another way to provide an insurance policy. It's not just about beauty, it's also about preservation.

What was the cause of this movement?

The museum world has always been somewhat isolated when it comes to artistic exposure by hotels or other commercial enterprises, which are by far their biggest patrons of art exposure. But there are two reasons why museums are starting to feel more comfortable with the expansion Exhibit Loans Outside Their Own Walls: The proliferation of sophisticated security systems and the idea of ??people coming into contact with beautiful objects may inspire a visit to a museum.

My sense is that no one knows the role of exposure in inspiring future museum visits, but everyone has an opinion and they love to share.

What is the difference between art in a hotel and other venues like restaurants?

I think there is a difference between artwork installed in a restaurant or hotel and a wall in a private home. Sometimes people buy original paintings for their homes because they are in love with a painting. However, in the museum, even if we have hundreds of visitors It is possible to be touched by certain works every day, and most people know more or less what they want to see, so exposure can be very specific to personal interests.

In the case of commercial establishments such as restaurants and hotels, customers can enjoy these creations without any prior research. All they get is exposure - the sheer pleasure of watching - and it's also rewarding.

How is art in a hotel different from a museum?

Museums are usually closed, while hotel spaces can be enjoyed at any time of the day. Museums have become more open to setting the right tone for appreciating art, but there is still some unease about people staying too long or making noise. I think most museums restrict photography It is important to create an atmosphere conducive to contemplation and enjoyment of the experience.

There's also the question of who decides where to display what. Do customers have a say? If they don't, is it right to choose art based on its ability to attract customers? Or are businesses acting like dictators when deciding what art to display in a given space?

Should places like hotels and restaurants that celebrate creativity -- and schools and hospitals -- have more say in the art that's installed on their walls?

I don't think it's a question of who has the final say. Museums understand the importance of sharing with others, which allows more people to discover and appreciate works for themselves. Hospitality leaders want to offer their guests something beautiful - not just Just a bed or twenty-four hours. We all know we need beauty, but also food and shelter; if we don't, we won't feel its absence when it's not there. So I think everyone wins: museums and galleries can extend their mission beyond protected walls, the public can get more Beautiful, hopefully meant for inspired tourists.

Conclusion

Some may think that having art in a hotel is like using images of beautiful things to sell or rent at a price tag, rather than actually experiencing their value without any cost - this is a concept I used to agree with but some have recently changed me after the idea To understand how much exposure people really need in an age when art appreciation has been so widely curtailed and technology is used as an excuse, especially the ease of taking pictures, this can be seen as sanitized viewing.

I used to think that having art in a hotel was like using images of beautiful things to sell or rent at a list price, rather than actually experiencing their value without any cost - this is a concept I used to agree with but have recently learned and changed my mind In this day and age how much exposure people really need, art appreciation has been cut so widely and technology is used as an excuse, especially the ease of taking pictures, which can be seen as sanitized viewing.

But why can't the landscaping of a hotel space also provide a different experience than a museum, since the public would rather choose to visit in advance rather than on-site when they are already in a hotel or restaurant?